|

|
Films that
Promote Peace & Nonviolence
|

|
Gallipoli (1981)
Gallipoli (1981)
Gallipoli
Also DVD
Gallipoli
Rated: 
Starring: Mark
Lee, Mel
Gibson, et al.
Director: Peter
Weir
An outstanding
drama, Gallipoli resonates with sadness long after you have seen it. Set
during World War I, this brutally honest antiwar movie was cowritten by director
Peter Weir. Mark Lee and a sinfully handsome Mel Gibson are young, idealistic
best friends who put aside their hopes and dreams when they join the war effort.
This character study follows them as they enlist and are sent to Gallipoli to
fight the Turks. The first half of the film is devoted to their lives and their
strong friendship. The second half details the doomed war efforts of the
Aussies, who are no match for the powerful and aggressive Turkish army. Because
the script pulls us into their lives and forces us to care for these young men,
we are devastated by their fate. --Rochelle O'Gorman
Gallipoli
(DVD)
Gallipoli
(VHS), with Mel Gibson. A tragic story of three Australian friends who
experience the 1915 Gallipoli invasion during World War One. Features some of
the most convincing depictions of the terror of going "over the top"
ever filmed, with its portrayal of the attack at "The Nek" on the
heights above the landing zone. Viewers should keep in mind that this assault
was really exceptional in its wastefulness. In many, many other cases, the
Australian, British and New Zealand troops not only made it to the Turkish
trenches, but often fought their way through several defense lines. Still, 50%
casualties were common, and so the shocking reality stands true.
Learning Guide to:
Gallipoli
Subjects: World/WW I, Australia & Turkey;
Character Development: Courage in War; Friendship;
Ethical Emphasis: Trustworthiness.
SELECTING THE MOVIE Quick
Discussion Question
Age: 13+; Rated PG; Drama; 1981; 111 minutes; Color; Available from Social
Studies School Service.
Description: This film shows the ill-fated attack on the Turk lines by
soldiers of ANZAC (Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) at Gallipoli during
the First World War.
Benefits: The lives of soldiers are often sacrificed in war to mistaken
tactics, stupidity, and bad luck. Gallipoli gives us a cardinal example of this
phenomenon. Other themes are the pressure of the rush to enlist, friendship
among soldiers, and their courage in the face of sure and imminent death. This
film will introduce a child to the roles that Australia and Turkey played in the
First World War, trench warfare, and the failed Gallipoli campaign.
Possible Problems: The young soldiers (and the viewer) look at pictures
of nude Egyptian prostitutes for a short period. The young soldiers are seen
going into a brothel. There are several historical inaccuracies, e.g., the
officer who insisted upon the charge being undertaken was Australian and not
British; contrary to the implications of the film, the British did their share
of fighting at Gallipoli, and suffered heavy casualties.
Selected Awards: 1981 Australian Film Institute: Best Film, Best
Actor (Gibson); 1982 Golden Globe Awards Nominations: Best Foreign Film.
Featured Actors: Mel Gibson, Mark Lee, Bill Kerr, David Argue, Tim
McKenzie, Robert Grubb.
Director: Peter Weir.
USING THE MOVIE
Helpful Background:
- See Learning Guide to All
Quiet on the Western Front for a description of trench warfare and
casualties in WW I. See Learning Guide to Paths
of Glory for description of the causes of the First World War.
- Turkey was a German ally during the First World War. Winston Churchill, at
that time First Lord of the British Admiralty, thought that if the British
could send the Navy through the Dardanelles they could point their guns at
Istanbul and force Turkey out of the War. But Turkish shore batteries on the
Gallipoli Peninsula and mine fields in the Dardanelles frustrated the
British plan. Churchill then decided to land troops at Gallipoli to take out
the shore batteries.
The invasion was unsuccessful. The defenders were commanded by Kemal Ataturk,
a determined officer who later lead the Turkish revolution against the
Ottomans. Ataturk was the father and first President of the modern state of
Turkey. Eventually, after almost 300,000 casualties and no results except
for the death of about 300,000 Turks, the British and ANZAC troops withdrew.
Churchill was relieved of his position as First Lord of the Admiralty and
ever after was taunted by the opposition with the cry: "What about the
Dardanelles?"
- On the whole this film is historically accurate. The purpose of the attack
was to divert Turkish attention from the real thrust of the Allied forces.
The artillery barrage, designed to force the Turks out of their trenches,
was scheduled to continue until 4:30 p.m. For some reason the artillery
barrage stopped at 4:23 p.m. The ANZAC attack occurred on time at 4:30 p.m.
In those seven minutes the Turks went back to their positions in the
trenches and were able to repulse the ANZAC attack.
- Life in the trenches was probably worse than is shown in the film. The
Australians, knowing they would die in the attack, left their watches,
rings, and notes for their loved ones in the trenches.
- Australia sent 300,000 men to fight in World War I and suffered 60,000
deaths, a casualty rate of 20%.
Discussion Questions:
- [Standard
Questions Suitable for Any Film].
- Should the Australian officer have ordered his men over the top on the
final charge?
- How does the charge shown in this movie differ from the failed attack on
the virtually impregnable Fort Wagner shown in the film Glory?
[The soldiers of the Massachusetts 54th used the attack on Fort Wagner to
prove that black soldiers could fight well in a modern war against hopeless
odds; while the attack on Fort Wagner failed to dislodge the Confederate
troops, it as a triumph for the Massachusetts 54th and black people in the
U.S.]
- On a map or a globe, show your child Istanbul, the Gallipoli peninsula and
the Dardanelles on a map.
Character Development
Courage in War
- Is it right to sacrifice your life for a lost cause?
- [Quick Discussion Question:] In the First World War defensive
technology (such as machine guns) gave defenders a great advantage. Can
you explain why millions of soldiers went over the top of the trenches and
faced the withering fire of the defenders's machine guns in a conflict
that was begun by mistake?
Ethical Emphasis
(Teachwithmovies.org is associated with Character
Counts and uses The
Six Pillars of Character to organize ethical principals.)
Discussion
Questions Relating to Ethical Issues are designed to maximize the use of
this film to teach ethical principles and critical viewing. One concept from
The Six Pillars of
Character that is raised in this film is Trustworthiness
(Be honest; Don’t deceive, cheat or steal; Be reliable —
do what you say you’ll do; Have the courage to do the right thing; Build a
good reputation; Be loyal — stand by your family, friends and country)
- What does this film tell you about the importance soldiers doing what they
say they will do?
Bridges to Reading: None.
Other Movies on Related Topics: For another movie about the British
fighting the Turks in World War I, see Lawrence
of Arabia.
Links to the Internet: A web page has been established to honor the Officers
of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps Killed at Gallipoli